International Legendary Museum: All-Time Squads Potential Assessment

All-Time Squads Potential Assessment

Methodological Procedures

All-Time Squad potential assessment is the team players potential calculation for all all-time squads in the museum, is factored by total skill rating application of each of eleven first team players, reserved players and manager based on ;

1) Primary Proportional criteria of the role of each player that fit to the formation system

2) Secondary Proportional criteria of functional line in the formation system.

Hence, there is no exact format of proportion of multifunctional role and functional line as it is depend on the role of player in any system. Offensive sweeper, side-back, central midfielder, winger, trequartista and forward all are considered in this scope and contribute more than one functional line. It is 100 percent weight of rating for only one functional play, are Goalkeeper, pure defender, playmaker and target striker.

In a final calculation of total assessment, proportion of functional line will be 20 percent DF-27.5 Percent MF-20 percent FW-20 percent Manager-12.5 percent Substitution. In ranking of rating, XI rating is secondary comparison in case squad rating is not significant different. Midfield rating is a thirdly comparison in case XI rating is not significant different. For only eleven players, proportion will be DF-30 Percent MF-40 percent FW-30 percent.

Result

Total Assessment

Rank	Total	Player XI	Defence	Midfield	Forward
1	World	World	Italy	World	La Liga
2	World Cup	World Cup	World	South Americas	South Ameircas
3	Europe	Series A	Europe	Series A	World Cup
4	Series A	Europe	Series A	World Cup	World
5	South Ameircas	South Americas	World Cup	Western Europe	Argentina
6	UEFA Euro	Brazil	UEFA Euro	Europe	Brazil
7	Argentina	Argentina	Juventus	Brazil	European Cup
8	European Cup	UEFA Euro	AC Milan	France	UEFA Euro
9	Brazil	La Liga	European Cup	Argentina	Europe
10	Western Europe	Western Europe	United Kingdom	Copa America	Real Madrid
11	La Liga	European Cup	Germany	La Liga	Series A
12	Italy	Italy	Rest of Latin Americas	Real Madrid	Western Europe
13	Real Madrid	Real Madrid	England	Juventus	Barcelona
14	Juventus	Juventus	Uruguay	UEFA Euro	Netherlands
15	France	France	Soviet Union	United Kingdom	Portugal
16	United Kingdom	United Kingdom	Argentina	European Cup	Hungary
17	AC Milan	AC Milan	South Ameircas	Barcelona	Germany
18	Inter Milan	Inter Milan	London	Manchester United	Inter Milan
19	Netherlands	Germany	Inter Milan	Italy	Iberia
20	Germany	Copa America	Balkan	Inter Milan	Rest of Central Europe
21	England	Netherlands	Yugoslavia	AC Milan	Juventus
22	Barcelona	England	Bayern Munich	England	Italy
23	Rest of Central Europe	Barcelona	Scandinavia	Netherlands	Copa Libertadores
24	Iberia	Hungary	Iberia	Hungary	France
25	Copa America	Iberia	Spain	Rome	AC Milan
26	Hungary	Rest of Central Europe	Czechoslovakia	Rest of Central Europe	Bayern Munich
27	Manchester United	Rest of Latin America	France	Iberia	Copa America
28	Spain	Manchester United	Brazil	Austria	Balkan
29	Austria	Spain	Real Madrid	Spain	England
	Bayern Munich	Balkan	Rest of Central Europe	Germany	Scandinavia
30	Rest of Latin Americas	Austria	Netherlands	Ireland	United Kingdom
31	Portugal	Scandinavia	Copa America	Yugoslavia	Rest of Latin Americas
32	London	Yugoslavia	Manchester United	Scandinavia	Spain
33	Balkan	Uruguay	La Liga	Balkan	London
34	Scandinavia	Bayern Munich	Austria	Copa Libertadores	Yugoslavia
35	Uruguay	Copa Libertadores	Liverpool	Uruguay	Austria
36	Yugoslavia	Portugal	Scotland	Bayern Munich	Scotland
37	Copa Libertadores	London	Ireland	Rest of Latin Americas	Sweden
38	Scotland	Rome	Western Europe	Romania	Soviet Union
39	Rome	Czechoslovakia	Hungary	Czechoslovakia	Bulgaria
40	Liverpool	Scotland	Belgium	Portugal	Denmark
41	Soviet Union	Soviet Union	Denmark	Scotland	Peru
42	Czechoslovakia	Ireland	Copa Libertadores	Sweden	Paraguay
43	Sweden	Romania	Paraguay	London	Manchester United
44	Ireland	Sweden	Wales	Peru	Rome
45	Romania	Peru	Rome	Paraguay	Uruguay
46	Peru	Paraguay	Chile	Wales	Liverpool
47	Poland	Liverpool	Romania	Poland	Poland
48	Bulgaria	Poland	Peru	Chile	Romania
49	Belgium	Bulgaria	Sweden	Bulgaria	Belgium
50	Denmark	Wales	Bulgaria	Liverpool	Czechoslovakia
51	Paraguay	Belgium	Barcelona	Belgium	Northern South Americas
52	Wales	Denmark	Poland	Subsaharan Africa	Rest of The Nordic
53	Chile	Chile	Latin North Americas	Soviet Union	Switzerland
54	Switzerland	Subsaharan-Africa	Subsaharan Africa	Northern South Americas	Chile
55	Northern South Americas	Northern South Americas	Portugal	Denmark	Wales
56	Greece	Rest of The Nordic	Turkey	Greece	Subsaharan Africa
57	Subsaharan Africa	Switzerland	Rest of The Nordic	Rest of The Nordic	Ireland
58	Rest of The Nordic	Greece	Greece	Switzerland	Latin North Americas
59	Turkey	Latin North Americas	North Africa	Turkey	Turkey
60	Latin North Americas	Turkey	Oceania	West Asia	Oceania
61	North Africa	North Africa	Northern South Americas	North Africa	East Asia
62	East Asia	Oceania	Switzerland	Latin North Americas	Greece
63	Oceania	West Asia	British North Americas	East Asia	North Africa
64	West Asia	East Asia	West Asia	Oceania	British North Americas
65	British North Americas	British North Americas	East Asia	British North Americas	West Asia

17 comments:

Naratorn Wirunhchatapant24/4/15
Recent Update

East Asia : Choi In-Young out : Kim Byung-Ji in
Austria : Johann Studnicka in
Chile : Arturo Vidal in
Italy : Renato Zaccarealli in
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous20/7/17
The first table is yellow and white and I can't read it, please fix it.
And what's the difference between "Total" and "XI"? The first one is XI plus manager plus substitution?
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous6/12/17
What is "London"??
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous28/4/18
The thing that I do not understand is that some countries feature considerably more or fewer high standard players than would be expected from their international record. Looking at the number of queen class or higher players per country some values make sense Brazil, Germany, Italy and Argentina lead with 39, 35, 31 and 31 receptively but further down there are some odd points for example Scotland has 11 the same number as Uruguay and far more than Columbia (0) or Mexico (1) which have better international records (according to the country evaluation). Likewise Austria has 7 but is likewise worse than Mexico, Switzerland(0) or Chile (1) in all time performance. Northern Ireland and Wales have 4 each while the vast majority of country's at that level like Costa Rica, Ghana, USA, Norway etc. have none. Hungary has 15 yet is just 1 place higher than Chile. While I can understand a country may have featured a couple better players than one that generally does better it simply does not seem plausible that a country like Scotland could have produced so many great players yet still perform worse than countries that had none or that Ryan Griggs, John Charles and 2 other Welsh players could be easily ahead of any players from Costa Rica, South Korea or Egypt (which have no players higher than prince silver) when Wales can qualify for any major tournament. I am not saying you are wrong as I can see that your methods of judging great players are consistent but do you know why this could be the case? Do some countries tend to produce players who play spectacularly for their clubs but show little commitment to or simply play poorly for the national team or just a disproportionate number of great players but not enough good players to put together a good team? Sorry if this is a difficult question and any way thanks for the amazing work you have put into this website I have never seen anything else like it.

ReplyDelete
Replies
a blob2/5/18
I understand that number of queen class players is not a perfect metric for example it would appear that most countries have relatively fewer defenders in this class than in other positions (Italy is a notable exception). I used this as it easy to quantify and show that Scotland or Hungary not only have more high class players than some similar countries but far more. Yes I used all time country performance ranking in which Mexico(21st) and Colombia (26th) rank higher than Scotland (28th) is there a different ranking on this website I know there are rankings such as the world football elo ratings however I accept the argument that your ranking is a better record of meaningful all time achievement (while the world football elo ratings are more useful I think for seeing the difficulty of beating a team right now). You say that players skill is more important than performance in club or NT I suppose this makes sense so is this to say that Wales had several players who were more skilled than say Cha bum Kun but that their actual performance is lower (in the same way that Ronaldinho was more skilled than Lothar Mattheus but did not necessarily add as much to the teams he played in)? Personally I would prefer to rank players based on the actual contribution they make to teams performance but this makes sense is that what you are saying? That in theory a first XI of the greatest Scottish players of all time would very probably win against the greatest XI Swiz players but that Scotland's actual NT performance is lower. By the way I brought up club Vs national team career based on the fact that a disproportionate number of top players in the EPL seem to have been from the other parts of Britain such as George Best, Kenny Daglish, Ryan Griggs etc. compared to these countries relatively poor international records however I could not think of enough players to really tell.
Ps I am trying to use several different examples to point out that this is not just one fluke comparison that has produced results which surprise me.

ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous7/5/18
So the criteria that determine that for example Ronaldinho loses his place (I assume to Garrincha) in the all time Brazilian first XI are different to those that determine that the Brazilian XI is stronger than the all time German first XI. Does that mean the it is still valid to consider for example Samuel Eto'o and say his class shows he is clearly not as good a player as George Best? (I know they do not fill the same position but it seems that wingers and strikers in the same class have a similar result in the player evaluation). By the way I know that your analysis shows George Best is a better player than Samuel Eto'o but I am asking if it is possible to see this by examining the International Legendary Museum. Ps I am also not saying that Ronaldinho was more skilled than Garrincha that is just an example of a national squad selection and sorry if the last post marked as a blob is confusing it is of course still me.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous11/5/18
ok so it is ONLY peak performance that determines the squads I had not realised that. However to be honest this was not really my question I was asking if players in different all time squads could be directly compared for the most extreme examples. Joseph Hugi is the greatest Swiz player of all time Jimmy McGory is the 9th greatest Scottish player of all time. Joseph is prince silver class Jimmy is queen bronze class and they are both strikers so that would say the Scot is comfortably a better player yet if Scotland are the 28th greatest football nation and Switzerland 19th (country evaluation) then it would seem extremely odd that there are 9 Scottish players better than the greatest Swiz player of all time in a similar situation Nwanko Kanu Nigeria's best ever player appears to be nowhere near as good a player as Gareth Bale not even in the top 5 greatest Welsh players. My original question was how could this be the case from your answer it would seem that Scottish and Welsh players all have extremely good performance for a few years but then lose ability is this the case (I am somewhat sceptical noting this was certainly not the case of Ryan Giggs)?. Or have these countries been blessed with about 10 exceptional players each while most players who have represented the national team have been of poor standard compared to those who represented Switzerland or Nigeria (this seems a little more likely) a combination of these is perhaps possible or is prince bronze class for a Nigerian player not the same as it is for Welsh players? I am not sure how else I can explain it this is the question I have been wondering.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous11/5/18
Now that explains it. I think I would still consider the players from similarly performing countries as having been of equal standard overall but that is perhaps just a personal preference as I think a vital component of greatness in a team sport is being able to work with the team even if other factors prevent this and maybe also a bias for international football. I considered bringing up Czechoslovakia but their 8th place in the country evaluation seemed like a rather odd result anyway in any case this is not the only site where I have noticed such a difference for example I noticed previously a site called footballs greatest that included only Hugo Sanchez from Mexico yet all countries with a better result in the world football elo ratings since 1970 (I had not seen this site before) had 9 players or more. As a side note is the use of qualifying in the country evaluation partly to prevent countries in weaker confederations from being rated too highly I noticed that all countries from outside Europe and South America would do better if only world cup and continental champs were considered?
ReplyDelete
Replies
Saptanshu15/6/21
This is very beautiful love your museum
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous13/9/21
Hellou!
RSSSF just released their new players with 500 or more goals, it took them like 5 years to research and find data on new entries:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_footballers_with_500_or_more_goals

Is there some of the newly added players that you didn't cover yet? I personally think Helmchen is interesting
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment